Skip to main content
added 78 characters in body
Source Link

What is your stance on users that have enough power to edit questions/answers without review, but abuse this power? For example going ahead and changing something that is not absolutely necessary, without trying to first suggest the user to make the change themselves, since un-necessary changes should be at the discretion of the original asker?

What is your stance on users that have enough power to edit questions/answers without review, but abuse this power? For example going ahead and changing something that is not absolutely necessary, without trying to first suggest the user to make the change themselves?

What is your stance on users that have enough power to edit questions/answers without review, but abuse this power? For example going ahead and changing something that is not absolutely necessary, without trying to first suggest the user to make the change themselves, since un-necessary changes should be at the discretion of the original asker?

Source Link

What is your stance on users that have enough power to edit questions/answers without review, but abuse this power? For example going ahead and changing something that is not absolutely necessary, without trying to first suggest the user to make the change themselves?